Apache Kafka 09 Aug 2024

Transactional Outbox Pattern

The Transactional Outbox Pattern addresses the dual-write problem by ensuring that database and message broker updates are atomic, consistent, and reliable, streamlining data synchronization between systems.

Transactional Outbox Pattern is an architectural solution for addressing consistency issues in distributed systems. In this blog, we’ll dive into the core principles of the Transactional Outbox Pattern, explore its benefits, and provide practical examples to help you implement this pattern in your systems.

The transactional outbox pattern uses database transactions to update both a microservice and an outbox table. Then, the events in the outbox are sent to an external messaging platform, such as Apache Kafka. This technique solves the dual-write problem, which occurs when data needs to be written to two separate systems, like a database and Apache Kafka. By using database transactions, we can ensure that the writes between the two tables are done together. Afterward, a separate process can consume the outbox and update the external system as required. This process can be implemented manually or with tools like Change Data Capture (CDC) or Kafka connectors.

A Dual-Write problem

When using distributed systems, the dual-write problem can occur. This happens when an application needs to perform two or more operations that need to be consistent, but involve different systems or services. For example, an application might need to save data to a database and send a corresponding message to a message broker, like Apache Kafka. If these operations are done separately and one of them fails, for example, the message to Kafka fails but the database write succeeds, the system can end up in an inconsistent state. This inconsistency can cause issues such as lost messages, duplicated data, or incomplete transactions, which makes maintaining data integrity across the system difficult.

Transactional Outbox Pattern

The Transactional Outbox Pattern is a design pattern used to solve the dual-write problem by ensuring that database operations and message publishing are performed atomically. Instead of writing directly to the message broker, the application writes the message or “outbox entry” to a special “outbox” table within the same database transaction as the business data. Once the transaction is committed, an external process reads the outbox table and publishes the messages to the message broker asynchronously. This approach guarantees that either both the database and the message are updated, or neither is, thereby maintaining consistency.

Sending events to Apache Kafka

To emit events to Apache Kafka using the transactional outbox pattern, the process typically involves the following steps:

  1. Write to Outbox Table:
    When a business transaction occurs, write the event data to an outbox table within the same database transaction.
  2. Process Outbox Table:
    Use an external service or tool to read the entries from the outbox table. This could be a separate service or a Kafka Connect connector specifically designed to poll the outbox table for new entries.
  3. Publish to Kafka:
    After reading the outbox entries, the service publishes the messages to the appropriate Kafka topic. Once confirmed, the outbox entry is typically marked as processed or deleted to avoid re-processing.
  4. Handle Failures:
    Ensure that the processing of outbox entries is idempotent so that if a failure occurs during publishing, the system can safely retry without duplicating messages.

Implementing Outbox Pattern

For a detailed guide on implementing the Transactional Outbox Pattern, including step-by-step instructions and best practices, check out our comprehensive blog post. Dive in here to master the technique and ensure data consistency across your systems.

Tools that must be used for processing an outbox

Several tools and frameworks can be used to process an outbox:

Guarantees the outbox pattern provide

The transactional outbox pattern ensures that each message is delivered to the message broker at least once, even if there is a failure. This may result in duplicate messages, but no messages will be lost. Additionally, by using additional mechanisms like idempotency keys or Kafka’s exactly-once semantics, you can achieve exactly-once delivery. Ensuring that each message is delivered only once without duplication.

Problems with the outbox pattern

While the transactional outbox pattern solves many issues, it also introduces some challenges:

Benefits of the Transactional Outbox Pattern

The Transactional Outbox Pattern provides several key advantages within distributed systems and microservices architecture:

Atomicity and consistency:

Ensures that database updates and message publishing occur together, maintaining data consistency across services.

Reliable message delivery:

Messages are delivered reliably, even if the service fails.

Improved scalability:

Facilitates horizontal scaling by decoupling message production and processing from the main transaction flow.

Reduced latency:

Offloading tasks to asynchronous processes lowers the time taken to process messages.

Services are loosely connected:

Promotes loose coupling, allowing services to evolve independently without tight interdependencies.

Simplifies handling of duplicate messages:

Operations are performed only once and the result will always be the same.

Easier maintenance and upgrades:

This feature streamlines maintenance and upgrades by isolating the messaging logic, reducing the impact on core business logic.

Conclusion – a powerful solution

The Transactional Outbox Pattern is a powerful tool for ensuring data consistency and reliability in distributed systems. By decoupling message creation from message delivery, this pattern addresses the challenges posed by the dual-write problem. Making it an essential strategy for modern microservices architectures. The benefits of maintaining atomicity, preventing data loss, and ensuring at least one delivery far outweigh the challenges.

Implementing the Transactional Outbox Pattern can enhance the resilience of your applications, especially when dealing with systems like Apache Kafka. Whether you are looking to streamline your event publishing or ensure consistency across services, this pattern provides a robust solution. However, it’s important to carefully consider the operational overhead and ensure your implementation includes strategies for managing outbox growth and idempotency. Adopting the Transactional Outbox Pattern can help you build more reliable and scalable systems that can handle more demands.

Axual’s all-in-one Kafka platform

For those looking to simplify the implementation of the Transactional Outbox Pattern and optimize event streaming, Axual offers an effective platform. Axual provides a managed, secure, and scalable event streaming service that integrates seamlessly with existing microservices architectures. With Axual, you can focus on building your business logic while leveraging powerful tools for event processing, monitoring, and governance. Axual handles the complexities of Kafka. Enabling you to implement the outbox pattern with ease, ensuring reliable, consistent, and scalable event delivery across your system.

Contact us

Answers to your Transactional Outbox Pattern Questions

What is the transactional outbox pattern?

The transactional outbox pattern helps solve the problem of making two separate updates when working with distributed systems: updating a database and notifying about an event or message.

What is the transactional outbox pattern in SQL Server?

The transactional outbox pattern is a commonly used design pattern for sending notifications about changes in an application’s state. It works by using a single transaction that covers both the database and the message broker for delivering the notification.

What is the difference between CDC and transactional outbox?

Change Data Capture (CDC) is a method for identifying altered data and enabling actions based on those changes. The “outbox pattern” involves service commands that update a database and send messages or events.

What are the disadvantages of transactional outbox?

Messages may be sent multiple times. If the publisher service fails to delete an operation from the database, the event from the outbox table might be read more than once by receiving services like shipping and payment.

What problem does the outbox pattern solve?

This system maintains data consistency and ensures that events are not lost. If a service fails before sending an event, the event isn’t lost; it remains in the outbox and can be processed when the service is back online. Additionally, this approach separates microservices from each other and from external event systems such as Kafka.

Other blogs

Apache Kafka 2 weeks ago

Understanding Kafka: Message Size, Producer Examples, and Consumer Groups

Understanding Kafka can seem challenging, but in this blog, we simplify the concepts of Kafka’s maximum message size, how to use Kafka producers, and what consumer groups do. Ideal for beginners and those looking to expand their knowledge.

Rachel van Egmond
Apache Kafka 3 weeks ago

Use Case | Logius legacy modernization for Dutch government  

Logius, with CGI and Axual, modernizes Dutch government communication using a scalable Kafka platform for efficient, secure, and future-proof digital services, streamlining interactions between government, citizens, and businesses.

Rachel van Egmond
Apache Kafka 3 weeks ago

Kafka Operator and linger.ms in Apache Kafka

Linger.ms in Kafka optimizes batch sending delays, balancing throughput and latency. Kafka Operators help manage this setting in Kubernetes, simplifying configuration and performance tuning for efficient data handling.

Rachel van Egmond

Apache Kafka is great, but what do you do
when great is not good enough?
See what Axual offers on top of Kafka.

Start your free trial
No credit card required